1. After going through many weekly writing, I think I like this writing pattern. Because the way of writing in English is fresh to me. And every week’s topic is interesting, too. But, I think there are some questions are too much alike such as “week ten’s self evaluation and peer review” and “week thirteen’s reflection.”
2. The two-way online discussion is a good way. Because when one posted his/her article, the other could response to him/her at once. It works much efficient. Nevertheless, the mode of two-way online discussion’s disadvantage is that the writer just can receive one other thought. If writers want to know more various aspects in the same question, they have to link other writers’ blogs. Sometimes, writers will think it was inconvenient, and they are also not willing to read the articles which not respond to them. So, if having a group blog to exchange ideas, writers can receive more ideas at the same time. But, when using this pattern, I think that writers who in same group blog should post their articles in the same time. Because, if the first writer delays posting his/her article; the second one, the third one will delay too. In doing so, the task will put off. In the sum, I would like choose the same way of writing on blog.
3. To be honest, we are smooth during our discussion on blog. Except for the beginning, my blog’s setting got some problem causing my keypal could not respond me smoothly. But latter, I fixed setting, it was going smoothly.
4. I like this project website. Apart from design well, every task’s background has abundant changes. In brief, this website is well-down.
5. I think I gained three things in this blog activity. First, the writing skill, after writing so many articles, I learn how to make my article more coherence and smooth and avoid to have unnecessary errors. The second is critical thinking, some questions tend to guide writers to make a comment such as“Britney Spears”and “The strawberry generation.” The last is that sharpen the speed of English typing.
